
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|||
As the anti-Montazeri campaign was extended to provinces and to the Bazaar, the conservative economic nerve centre of the country, the new President, ayatollah Mohammad Khatami was for the first time publicly took to task by pro-Khameneh'i newspaper for continuing his "strange, if not significant silence". In a first direct hint, the newspaper "Jomhuri Eslami" (Islamic Republic), which is the mouth piece of the ayatollah Ali Khameneh'i' warned Mr Khatami to "broke" his silence (over the present confrontation between Mr Khameneh'i and Mr Montazeri) "or face the same faith of that manipulated naïve", a reference to the grand ayatollah Hosseinali Montazeri. "Naïve and manipulated" are adjectives reportedly used by the grand ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeiny when, in 1989 and months before his death, he dismissed Mr Montazeri as his successor. "Non active binding and obedience to the Imam (the ayatollah Khomeiny) has consequences some of them one can see these days in the life of a man who for years fought in the line of the Imam but then betrayed him", the paper wrote, adding "if you think the way this man is confronted by the public wrath is illegal, you should have first condemned him because of his illegal activities. Your silence is not compatible with the line of the late Imam. You do not have any justification for your silence". The conservative's organ "Resalat" went even farther, telling the president if he think that he can not work properly under present conditions, he should "go to the leader, offer his resignation and explains his reasons to the public". The "demonisation" of Mr Montazeri in the largely pro-Khameneh'i controlled media continue unabated even as some leading conservative clergymen, some of them very close to Mr Khameneh'i, proposed a "cease fire" considering the forthcoming Islamic Summit which is to be held in Tehran in two weeks time and, in an effort to stop growing erosion of the leader's position and powers, drew a line between capacities and conditions to be a religious leader from that for becoming a valyi, by suggesting that while a marja (source of emulation) has to master all religious matters, the valy is not subject to the same conditions and may well not possess proper religious credentials. This theory was first publicly expressed Friday by the ayatollah Ali Meshkini, the Friday Imam of the religious city of Qom, who is also Speaker of the Assembly of Experts and a close family relative to the ayatollah Khameneh'i. "Someone who is not the most learned in religious matters but possess the conditions for the velayat can become the leader of the society but being the most learned one in religious matters is not enough to become a valy. In other words, one can be the religious leader while at the same time another person can be the leader of the society", Mr Meshkini said. What surprised many Iranian analyst is that Mr Meshkini and all other
clerics who, in defence of Mr Khamen'i, are now taking the same line are
openly admitting that he is not a marja, a position he and his supporters
have fought by all means and ways to tailor for him.
|
|||