HAVING THE BENEFIT OF THE DOUBT, SHARON CAN MAKE PEACE OR GET WAR

By Safa Haeri

TEL AVIV 8TH Feb. (IPS) Being prepared for Ariel Sharon’s victory, -- not on such a huge scale though --, Israeli press of Wednesday reacted cautiously to the dramatic upturn in Israeli politics, acknowledging that the road ahead is bumpy and uncertain for the new right wing Premier.

Announcing under big banners Mr. Sharon’s landslide victory over his unfortunate Labour rival and the unexpected decision by the outgoing Ehud Barak to resign from both his seat in the parliament and the leadership of the Party, Israeli press gave the new Prime Minister the benefit of the doubt on his promises of delivering "peace and security".

"To the last minute, Barak kept upright with his mistakes and policy of consulting no one, as shown by his sudden announcement of abandoning the leadership of Labour and resigning from Knesset, decisions that surprised not only the new Prime Minister-elect but also his closest allies", observed the rightist "Jerusalem Post".

"Like others holding the post of Prime Minister before him, Sharon will also discover that the diplomatic and security reality seen from Prime Minister’s Office is not identical to that on the outside", editorialised the leftist "Ha’aretz".

Having explained that from the point of view of the Palestinians "who yearn for independence and liberation from their humiliating condition of dependency on Israeli officials and troops, the occupation of territories can no longer continue" the paper said Israel also can not bear the continuation of the occupation with its moral corruption and its damage to security and diplomatic positions.

"The need to end the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has become pressing s a result of the conflagration which erupted four months ago. Sharon has a choice: to take up the negotiations from the point at which they halted at Taba and continue in an effort to reach a peace agreement; or to turn in a completely different direction and fulfil the darkest predictions of his rivals, who forecast that his rise to power would mean the destruction of he peace process and the detrioration of Israeli-Palestinian relations into a broad-based armed confrontation. Choosing the second option would be disastrous", Ha’aretz warned Wednesday.

Actually, the first official Palestinian reactions were cautious. Palestinian Authority Chairman Yaser Arafat sent a congratulation message to Ariel Sharon, whom he had met secretly in Vienna just a week before the crucial elections, saying he hoped to resume peace talks with Israel's new government.

Low-level violence persisted in the West Bank and Gaza Strip throughout the Election Day, with gun battles erupting in several locations and dozens of Palestinians injured in clashes with Israeli troops, as Palestinian activists, including Marwan Barghouti of the Fattah promised that the intifida would continue, regardless of who was Israel's prime minister.

While Arab press reacted sometimes with indifference and elsewhere with vehemence at Mr. Sharon’s victory, Iranian hard line commentators strongly urged the entire Arab world to firmly gear up to meet the "challenges of the Zionist entity under the leadership of Sharon".

His promise to form a unity government involving other parties is "a big hoax", the radical English Language "Keyhan International" wrote, adding that the prospects of Sharon's victory in Tuesday's presidential (sic) elections "implies that no doves exist even among the ordinary Israeli people, who are all made of the same stuff and are attuned to the extremist Zionist way of thinking", the paper said, obviously not understanding that the elections were not for president but to choose a prime Minister.

Labelling Sharon as the "most despised" man among the Palestinians because his very name revokes haunting memories of the "Sabra and Shatila" camps massacres, the pro-conservative paper pointed out that "if after 18 years of the Lebanon war, when he was written off as a bad debt, Sharon can now return with a sweeping victory, then the worst kind of scenarios in the occupied territories will be witnessed in the future".

Other Israeli papers said since the composition of the parliament has not changed, Sharon would be a "prisoner" of smaller parties that would "squeeze him for advantages" as much as they could.

The fact is that even if his call to the defeated Labour to form a government of national unity is heard, yet these two largest parties could not form a working majority without smaller organisations.

Sharon can count on 62 to 64 votes. This means he would be held hostage of individual deputies or small parties. ENDS ISRAEL ELECTIONS REACTIONS 8202