Latest ArticlesArchivesForumsRSS FeedGuestbookContact UsSearch

Iran Press Service (logo)

As of January 2009, this site is definitely closed, but you can follow Safa Haeri on his new blog: DAMAVAND at

Iran And Moqtada Al-Sadr Victors Of Battle Of Asra

Published Thursday, April 3, 2008

Paris, 3 April (Le Monde) If there remained the slightest doubt as for the major influence Iran has on the affairs of its Iraqi neighbor, the cease-fire concluded on Sunday 30  March, between the radical militia chief, the Shi’ite Moqtada Al-Sadr and three missi dominici representing the Prime Minister Nouri Al-Maliki, also Shi’ite, should have definitively raised it.         

            Because it was in Qom, the headquarters of the Iranian religious authority that the negotiations took place. And it is, according to a reliable source, under the supervision of an Iranian soldier, and not a simple one, but that of General Qassem Suleimani, the Commander of the notorious Al-Qods brigades of the Pasdarans, that this cease-fire was finally concluded.

The cease-fire between Iraqi Prime Minister and Moqtada al Sadr was brokered by the Iranians

            Incidentally, at least two of the three special representatives of Mr. Maliki, namely Hadi Al Amari and Ali Adib, have dual Iraqi-Iranian nationality and they both lived some years of exile in Teheran. Mr. Adib is member of the same religious party as the Prime Minister (Da’awa), and Mr. Amari is the chief of a powerful allied militia, the Badr organization, which dominates the commandment of the new Iraqi national army and which was created, financed and trained in Iran since 1980.

            Throughout the week of armed confrontations that the Americans approved, helped, and which made at least 470 killed and thousands of casualties, they did not cease encouraging Teheran "to put all its influence at the service of the stabilization" of the situation.

            It is done now. Washington and Teheran can mutually accuse each other of the worse misdeeds in Iraq, but many are the political analysts in this country to think that the two powers agree at least on the need for not letting a general chaos invading Iraq.

Basra fightings
Moqtada al Sadr's fighters resisted assaults of the Iraqi army in Basra.

            Engaged in the north in an offensive against the Sunnite rebels of Al-Qaida, the Americans, who do not have permanent military presence in Basra, apparently believed Mr. Maliki when he told them that his offensive would be almost an easy drive. As some of the Iraqi generals themselves confirmed, they were "surprised" by the combativeness of the Army of Mahdi, the militia of the sadrist current and by his capacity to mobilize partisans in all the large cities of the Shi’ite south and up to Baghdad.

            Mr. Maliki did not reach any the objectives which he had laid down. The "18 militia” registered in Basra by Mr. Hosham Dawod, a French-Iraqi researcher, are always in place and continuing with their juicy traffics. None the districts of Basra or elsewhere that were under the control of the Army of Mahdi were taken. Hundreds of police officers and soldiers across the country refused to open fire on the militiamen and at times, even joined them. For their first large scale operation under national command, and in spite of 30 000 men on the spot, the new Iraqi army and police force formed by the Americans had to call on the Anglo-Saxon allies in order to advance, or to get them out of the quagmire.

President Bush who had encouraged the initiative of his ally and had judged that it was a "historical test for free Iraq" must bite the fingers

            Theoretically valid until 8 of April, the offer of the Prime Minister "to purchase" the heavy weapons of the combatants at high price had practically produce nothing.

            Mr. Maliki, who had imprudently sworn to remain in Bassora "until the victory", had to return to Baghdad with a much meaner political credibility than before the offensive. The fact that he qualified, on Tuesday, the operations as a "success" and then abstains from signaling the end of the conflict, des not change anything to the situation. There will be undoubtedly other confrontations among the Shi’ites before the next regional elections scheduled for first of October.    "This is a great victory for Iran", says regretfully Mr. Mahmoud Othman, a Kurdish MP close to the presidency of the Republic, an official always very well informed. "Teheran showed that it is it and not Washington that has the upper hand on our affairs. The aims of Iran are to make Maliki as weak as possible so that he is obliged to accept its objectives. In fact, he was forced to run to Qom to negotiate", he adds.

            President Bush who had encouraged the initiative of his ally and had judged that it was a "historical test for free Iraq" must bite the fingers. ENDS IRAQ IRAN 4408

Editor’s note: The above article was published by the French influential left wing daily Le Monde on 3 April 2008

Translation and highlights are by IPS





3 comment(s) on this page. Add your own comment below.

Friday, April 4, 2008 05:08 [ 1 ]

The caption for the photograph is very telling... "According to many analysts, the latest fightings in Basra showed Iran had the upper hand in Iraqi affairs."

If it were the intent of the United States to forever control Iraqi affairs, there would be no issue, no militias firing mortar rounds and no safe place to hide.

There would be many large detention centers around Iraq and much room to drive Iraqi streets.

The goal of US involvement is to NOT be involved in the future. This is the essense of "self government, by and for the people".

The Iranian government is the imperialist seeking to steal from their neighbor while pretending to be an ally.

Does Iranian president Amadjihad think the world is blind to his tactics?


Spin the truth as much as you want, you can't make a turd smell like a rose.

neema t
Thursday, April 10, 2008 21:12 [ 2 ]


Iran has once again helped its neighbor to the west, Iraq (or the country formerly known as) stabilize a potentially devestating rift between the various political groups and prevent full scale civil war. instead of thanks and praised being heaped (and rightly deserving) upon the Iranian governemnt for using its influence to bring about the cease fire, inexplicably the western media and puff pieces like this article have found a wonderful way of twisting the facts to make Tehran look like the bad guy!

Lets get some facts straight. Iraq is the West's mess. Anything that happens there is thier responsiblity. Iran did not cause the invasion, Iran did not cause the US to kill and displace millions of Iraqi's, Iran did not cause the secterian strife in Iraq, nor did it cause the collapse of the Iraqi civil and social structure (this usually happens when you destroy infrastructure, laws and the way of life of a nation through unprovoked war) The US govt and her allies (stooges) did all this. So while they (the US war profiteers) continue to rape, pillage, steal oil, and destroy a nation and its culture (Iraq), let us never forget who is really responsible here.

If the Iranian govt. is imperlialist, what then is the correct way of describing the govt's of Washington and London? Peacekeepers? Give me a break. Give us all a break. Say no to western imperialism. Enough said

Thursday, April 24, 2008 14:50 [ 3 ]

I can't recall the name of the Security Institute, but they claimed that the two Iraqi lawmakers that traveled to Iran carried with them pictures and documents proving Iran had been funding, training, and arming the Mahdi and threatened to hand the proof over to the US, if Al-Sadr wasn't immediately cut off from paramilitary aid.

Last Saturday, the Iraqi military reported taking control of the last Mahdi stronghold in Basra seizing large caches of weapons and equipment along the way with little or no resistance.

The latter event might help confirm the former assumption.

Comments on this page are closed.

As of January 2009, this site is definitely closed, but you can follow Safa Haeri on his new blog: DAMAVAND at

According to many analysts, the latest fightings in Basra showed Iran had the upper hand in Iraqi affairs.

Powered by the Big Medium content management system. sitemap xml